Nominal dimensions. Not a vehicle fitment check.

Your tire sizes

Original size

New size

For example, 225/45R18. P, LT and ZR markings are accepted for nominal geometry only.

Units

Nominal size comparison

Original size265/70R17Overall diameter802.80 mm
New size285/70R17Overall diameter830.80 mm
Tire comparison reportNominal dimensions. Not a vehicle fitment check. Tire comparison report Original265/70R17802.80 mmOverall diameterNew285/70R17830.80 mmOverall diameterAligned to a shared ground line Nominal dimensions. Not a vehicle fitment check.

Aligned to a shared ground line

Every dimension

DimensionOriginal sizeNew sizeChange
Overall diameter802.80 mm830.80 mm+28 mm (+3.49%)
Width265.00 mm285.00 mm+20 mm
Sidewall185.50 mm199.50 mm+14 mm
Rim diameter431.80 mm431.80 mm0 mm
Circumference2,522.07 mm2,610.04 mm+87.96 mm
Revolutions per km396.50 rev/km383.14 rev/km-13.36 rev/km
Revolutions per mile638.10 rev/mi616.60 rev/mi-21.51 rev/mi

Theoretical speed

103.49 km/h

Assumes calibration to the original nominal circumference. This is not a measured road speed.

Enter 1–12 speeds separated by commas. Each must be between 0 and 400.

Indicated speedTheoretical speed
3031.05
5051.74
6062.09
100103.49
120124.19

Odometer distance estimate

Theoretical distance traveled: 103.49 km

Uses the same nominal circumference ratio as the speed table. This trip scenario is temporary and is not saved or exported.

Distance formula and assumptions

What changed?

Save comparison

Saved only in this browser. Export JSON before clearing site data or moving to another device.

Use a name you will recognize. Up to 120 characters.

Download your comparison

PDF is for reading or printing. Choose JSON to restore an editable calculation.

Paper size

What changes between these markings

At a fixed 70-percent aspect ratio, 20 mm more nominal width adds 14 mm to each sidewall. The diameter therefore grows by 28 mm even though both markings use a 17-inch rim. A 14 mm radius change is geometric; it is not a measured lift or a clearance guarantee.

With 265/70R17 as original and 285/70R17 as new, nominal diameter changes from 802.8 to 830.8 mm: +28 mm (+3.49%). Nominal section width changes by +20 mm and sidewall height by +14 mm per side.

Circumference and theoretical speed

Calculated circumference changes from 2522.07 to 2610.04 mm. Revolutions per kilometer change from 396.5 to 383.14, a −3.37% change. Circumference follows diameter in this circular model; revolution counts move in the opposite direction.

At an indicated 100 km/h, the size-ratio calculation gives 103.49 km/h for the new size. At an indicated 60 mph it gives 62.09 mph. Both examples assume calibration corresponds to the original nominal circumference and ignore existing instrument bias and real rolling deformation.

Keep the comparison direction explicit

The published URL keeps one stable order for this pair. Here 265/70R17 is the original denominator. Reversing the inputs gives a −3.37% diameter change and 96.63 km/h at an indicated 100 km/h. Use Swap in the editable tool to inspect that direction; changing only the sign would be inaccurate.

Half of the diameter difference is +14 mm of nominal radius change. It is not a measured ride-height change, and the width difference does not locate the installed sidewall without wheel and product information.

Why this pair has a reference page

A Ranger5G author asks whether to change an order from 265/70R17 to 285/70R17 after selecting suspension modifications. The exact pair supplies editorial context. Those modifications and the replies do not establish general clearance or fitment, and the 285/70R17 manufacturer evidence retains its LT prefix.

The linked manufacturer entries establish the individual size markings. The public discussion establishes an editorial reason to compare them. Neither source role supplies a fitment approval, search-volume estimate, purchase recommendation or universal acceptable percentage. Check complete vehicle and product requirements separately.

Sources and further reading

Keep exploring