Nominal dimensions. Not a vehicle fitment check.

Your tire sizes

Original size

New size

For example, 225/45R18. P, LT and ZR markings are accepted for nominal geometry only.

Units

Nominal size comparison

Original size255/70R17Overall diameter788.80 mm
New size265/70R17Overall diameter802.80 mm
Tire comparison reportNominal dimensions. Not a vehicle fitment check. Tire comparison report Original255/70R17788.80 mmOverall diameterNew265/70R17802.80 mmOverall diameterAligned to a shared ground line Nominal dimensions. Not a vehicle fitment check.

Aligned to a shared ground line

Every dimension

DimensionOriginal sizeNew sizeChange
Overall diameter788.80 mm802.80 mm+14 mm (+1.77%)
Width255.00 mm265.00 mm+10 mm
Sidewall178.50 mm185.50 mm+7 mm
Rim diameter431.80 mm431.80 mm0 mm
Circumference2,478.09 mm2,522.07 mm+43.98 mm
Revolutions per km403.54 rev/km396.50 rev/km-7.04 rev/km
Revolutions per mile649.43 rev/mi638.10 rev/mi-11.33 rev/mi

Theoretical speed

101.77 km/h

Assumes calibration to the original nominal circumference. This is not a measured road speed.

Enter 1–12 speeds separated by commas. Each must be between 0 and 400.

Indicated speedTheoretical speed
3030.53
5050.89
6061.06
100101.77
120122.13

Odometer distance estimate

Theoretical distance traveled: 101.77 km

Uses the same nominal circumference ratio as the speed table. This trip scenario is temporary and is not saved or exported.

Distance formula and assumptions

What changed?

Save comparison

Saved only in this browser. Export JSON before clearing site data or moving to another device.

Use a name you will recognize. Up to 120 characters.

Download your comparison

PDF is for reading or printing. Choose JSON to restore an editable calculation.

Paper size

What changes between these markings

A 10 mm width increase at a 70-percent aspect ratio adds 7 mm to each sidewall. The outside diameter grows by 14 mm with the rim held at 17 inches. Nominal section width grows by 10 mm; the page cannot infer the installed outer edge from that alone.

With 255/70R17 as original and 265/70R17 as new, nominal diameter changes from 788.8 to 802.8 mm: +14 mm (+1.77%). Nominal section width changes by +10 mm and sidewall height by +7 mm per side.

Circumference and theoretical speed

Calculated circumference changes from 2478.09 to 2522.07 mm. Revolutions per kilometer change from 403.54 to 396.5, a −1.74% change. Circumference follows diameter in this circular model; revolution counts move in the opposite direction.

At an indicated 100 km/h, the size-ratio calculation gives 101.77 km/h for the new size. At an indicated 60 mph it gives 61.06 mph. Both examples assume calibration corresponds to the original nominal circumference and ignore existing instrument bias and real rolling deformation.

Keep the comparison direction explicit

The published URL keeps one stable order for this pair. Here 255/70R17 is the original denominator. Reversing the inputs gives a −1.74% diameter change and 98.26 km/h at an indicated 100 km/h. Use Swap in the editable tool to inspect that direction; changing only the sign would be inaccurate.

Half of the diameter difference is +7 mm of nominal radius change. It is not a measured ride-height change, and the width difference does not locate the installed sidewall without wheel and product information.

Why this pair has a reference page

A Ranger5G thread proposes 255/70R17, and the replies explicitly discuss 265/70R17 as another size. This is evidence of a shared comparison discussion, not a claim about search popularity or a direct two-option survey.

The linked manufacturer entries establish the individual size markings. The public discussion establishes an editorial reason to compare them. Neither source role supplies a fitment approval, search-volume estimate, purchase recommendation or universal acceptable percentage. Check complete vehicle and product requirements separately.

Sources and further reading

Keep exploring